how communism is presented and held en mass today seems to be as a bunch of people hating richness. how libertarianism is presented and held en mass seems to be

how communism is presented and held en mass today seems to be as a bunch of people hating richness. how libertarianism is presented and held en mass seems to be people that hate non-trivial social demands that are created by any central authority. neither represent the actual theories or meaning behind communism or libertarianism. if one assumes a purist theory of communism (something more akin to unionism) and an impure version of libertarianism (something closer to market neo-liberalism) -- then the article rings out. In any other combination the point of the article becomes debatable. while I understanding that both communist and libertarian theories were about a lot more than being a grumpy white man, attempts to closely tie modern era decentralization movements to these nearly antiquated theories feels at many times to be a thing white men do to justify their grumpiness. The article didn't go there (it carefully only uses the word "communistically") but much of the discussion on the article does.