3 ms·
The whole argument is non-sensical. "Its not some broken piece of shit" or "it doesn't suck" are meaningless unless you give us what "piece of shit" or "sucking
by jfaucett 11y ago
The whole argument is non-sensical. "Its not some broken piece of shit" or "it doesn't suck" are meaningless unless you give us what "piece of shit" or "sucking" really is. "Linux" isn't even clarified so is this just talking about the kernel and implying that other os kernels provide definitions of "sucking" and "piece of shit"? *BSD certainly provide good kernels that don't suck and aren't "pieces of shit". Is it talking about full blown operating systems? That's not clear either... I'll just stop.
- vortico 11y agoI think the argument is being made to users of entirely different environments, like monolithic software in Windows or mouse-controlled GUI applications on OS X. You could replace Linux with BSD, the GNU toolset, or the general concept of the command-line interface, and the image would still be making the same point.