4 ms·
The startup world has pretty much destroyed future chances of making a living from an application. Sure, the top 10 apps in the apple store might be making goo
by paulhauggis 11y ago
The startup world has pretty much destroyed future chances of making a living from an application. Sure, the top 10 apps in the apple store might be making good money, but most apps that charge $1.99 will most likely not pay a living wage to the people that created it.
The same thing happened to the music industry. The total amount of revenue has dropped 10 fold since 1999. I know a few independent artists and they can't really make a living on just music anymore. They need to sell t-shirts or have a day job. So in the end, free music and file sharing has decreased the overall cost of music, but it really only hurt the small and independent artists.
Even look at things like Spotify. 1,000,000 plays nets an artists something like $100.
It has forced many artists to go with large labels because the large labels will take all of the risk and actually pay them some sort of a living while they are touring.
Software is going the same way. With all of the open source out there (and more coming out every day), it has allowed companies to hire software mechanics for pennies instead of software engineers for a living wage. Why? Because all of the parts that need to be engineered are given out for free. Development now in most businesses is mashing frameworks and libraries together. It really doesn't take a computer science education to get the job done.
Business owners are also becoming more tech savvy as the older generation retires.
I've never seen so many smart communities of people put themselves out of a job so quickly.
To me, apps are just an interfaces to a paid service, not the actual service itself. So, I might have a service that you pay X amount of money to use and the app is something free that is thrown in as a benefit.
- quasiuna 11y agoTotally agree with your comments about the music industry, however I don't think the same applies to software development. If many businesses can now get by with "mashing frameworks and libraries together" then that is a good thing - it means problems have been solved in a repeatable way that many people can benefit from, and the real software engineers, rather than doing the same old work over again can refocus on new challenges and create the frameworks and libraries of tomorrow. Is that really a bad thing? The only people putting themselves out of a job are people trying to earn a living working on problems that were solved a long time ago. Suggesting there are fewer jobs now for software engineers than any time in the past is a bit of a stretch!