Sure and I agree with your first sentence and second sentence, but I don't think you're understanding what I'm trying to communicate. The loaded term "wise cus

Sure and I agree with your first sentence and second sentence, but I don't think you're understanding what I'm trying to communicate. The loaded term "wise custodians" as if rich people are benevolent caretakers of the world's wealth due to their infinite wisdom is what I'm attacking here. It just simply isn't true. Justin Bieber is full proof of that. The guy is not wise, he's not a benevolent custodian either. Wealth is not magically redirected towards smart caring people. You are not a "wise custodian" because you are rich. You will always have stupid people who are rich and smart people who are not rich.