4 ms·
I think the author's point was that JSON-LD isn't primarily intended for existing users of RDF, SPARQL etc. Most developers already work with JSON on a regular
by Rezo 11y ago
I think the author's point was that JSON-LD isn't primarily intended for existing users of RDF, SPARQL etc. Most developers already work with JSON on a regular basis (not so much RDF), and JSON-LD is a model for merging and combine data sources, in JSON.
It's good that conversion from and to RDF is now standardized, but it's probably not something that your average dev is going to be taking advantage of. They'll likely continue to ingest, process and store the data in JSON.
- mark_l_watson 11y agoThat is a good point. I am still trying to wrap my head around using JSON-LD. One advantage of RDFS (or OWL) is being able to integrate different data sources using different schemas. That probably is just not a typical JSON-LD use case. BTW, I have written a couple books on the semantic web, so that shows my prejudices :-)