> I don't know how "10 to A, 20 to B" could indicate anything beyond the simple fact that the voter prefers B to A. Scores are actual utilities with added loss

> I don't know how "10 to A, 20 to B" could indicate anything beyond the simple fact that the voter prefers B to A. Scores are actual utilities with added loss, from: - ignorance - normalization - rounding error - tactical voting The way you measure the combined impact of that loss is with Bayesian regret. http://ScoreVoting.net/BayRegsFig.html http://ScoreVoting.net/BayRegsFig.html So those scores HAVE meaning. That meaning is muddied by the aforementioned loss, but it is lunacy to say it only "could indicate anything beyond the simple fact that the voter prefers B to A".