4 ms·
Hummm... I do agree that Haskell will be faster and less memory intensive than erlang, but this benchmark is not really significant... I am not going to use e
by siscia 11y ago
Hummm...
I do agree that Haskell will be faster and less memory intensive than erlang, but this benchmark is not really significant...
I am not going to use erlang to write a mandelbrot...
- dons 11y agoYeah, it could well be that you just care about latency hiding on e.g. network services. For that raw compute and memory is much less important than having a reasonable thread scheduler and cheap threads.
- siscia 11y agoExactly my point :) I was wonder, how well haskel does in that area...