2 ms·
What I'm trying to say is that I don't think it furthers their goal. It isn't like some terrorist act occurred which would've been uncovered with Section 215 s
by nerdy 11y ago
What I'm trying to say is that I don't think it furthers their goal.
It isn't like some terrorist act occurred which would've been uncovered with Section 215 still active. This happened on their watch and under the so-called protection of the Patriot Act. To me, it seems like just another example of the Patriot Act not protecting people.
- toomuchtodo 11y agoYou're right on both counts, but keep in mind how few people are going to understand that. The media is going to report it as "rabble rabble rabble Chinese hackers because patriot act expired".
- fweespeech 11y agoHow much would you like to bet that this will be spun as they need more powers like Section 215 and people will believe them in large numbers?