3 ms·

I think you are confusing cause and effect. Pocket was not added to Firefox because Firefox users demanded a sophisticated offline reader. If that were all ther

• fabrice_d 11y ago
  Pocket is not paying Mozilla, as said already. Also, anyone implementing a compatible backend can switch to it by changing a pref.
  • browser 11y ago
    Can we get a public statement from Mozilla describing its deal with Pocket? I see a comment below from a Mozilla employee stating that "there is limited public information available about this deal", and claiming that the best quote is in an article that contains a paraphrase from an email from another Mozilla employee saying that Pocket didn't pay for placement. When a non-profit gives prominent placement to a for-profit company, there are many ways for money to change hands beyond straight up payment for placement. I think we are owed a clear explanation of the Mozilla-Pocket deal.
    • dblohm7 11y ago
      > Can we get a public statement from Mozilla describing its deal with Pocket? I've been pleading internally for an official public response. Nothing. The only other source I've seen is an email reply from Mark Mayo at http://www.planet-libre.org/?post_id=18514 http://www.planet-libre.org/?post_id=18514