3 ms·
I studied* Humanities Computer Science, as it was called at my university at the time. Behind closed doors, the professor was fairly explicit about it not being
by pluma 11y ago
I studied* Humanities Computer Science, as it was called at my university at the time. Behind closed doors, the professor was fairly explicit about it not being as world-changing, innovative or new as it was presented whenever they were seeking funding. Their work ranged from metadata tagging to version control to long-term digital archives.
In fact, he said the field had been renamed several times, largely to make it seem like a new field when it wasn't. Digital Humanities, Humanities Computer Science, and so on all refer to the same loosely defined field.
Although there certainly is something in it that isn't entirely nebulous, I'm not convinced "Digital Humanities" in itself, really is a thing or that the definition has any practical use other than providing a label when you seek funding.
*note: I was enrolled for a lengthy period of time and spent most of my time in university with their department and in the student association but I left without a degree.
- ethanmiller 11y agoIt is in many respects nebulous, but that I think is because it's not quite a discipline. It can't quite mark out it's domain and jurisdiction in the way a traditional discipline might, and that's in large part because the transformation in cultural practices -- economic, analytical, subjective, etc -- that the advent of computing, software, and big data is generating is so momentous. It will require a transformation of the basic assumptions that lay at the base of professional training in the humanities all across the board.