4 ms·

You should fire whoever wrote this for communication shortcomings that will eventually damage the company.

• anigbrowl 11y ago
  That's ridiculous, but it is poorly written. The article should explain the legal situation clearly at the outset, before going on to the entertaining business of how it conducted its digital repossession operation.
  • stevebmark 11y ago
    Writing a blog post can have many correlations to how a person works in a company/team. This post has no time put into it at all. The author may be lazy or not committed to any work/quality. The blog post has no effort at all put into explaining the circumstances, making it convoluted. The author cannot clearly communicate context, making it painful to work with the author on a team that shares complex ideas (such as algorithms, or system wide changes). There has clearly been no editing on this post. The author is sloppy, and does not research what goes into good work. The story is poorly written, even around simple details. The author cannot communicate simple ideas clearly. That this article got through any sort of PR shield at all (likely they have none?) is strange enough, but it may also imply the author does not care/seek out team feedback, and may not be willing to entertain the ideas of colleagues. It actually seems like typical founder writing (and behavior). A quick, efficient one-off, with just enough information to get by.
    • SamReidHughes 11y ago
      Making some frivolously high-effort blog post would only signal that the company's desperate for business and that would hurt them.
    • mst 11y ago
      I understood it fine, and found it infinitely more pleasant to read than the post I'm replying to since your excessive use of italics made it read more like terrible marketing copy than a critique.