4 ms·
"Mozilla's recent integration with Pocket, a proprietary third-party service, is a mistake." This seems perfectly clear. The obvious improvement is to remove i
by yarrel 11y ago
"Mozilla's recent integration with Pocket, a proprietary third-party service, is a mistake."
This seems perfectly clear. The obvious improvement is to remove it.
What is wrong with Mozilla at the moment?
- sp332 11y agoI guess I'm just missing the point. The recommended action is to move Pocket to an extension that might even be shipped with the browser. I just don't see how it's different from "integrating" with the browser in that case. If the privacy implications were better explained and it was easier to disable, what would the problem be?
- pc2g4d 11y agoAn extension can be removed completely. An integrated feature, even if disabled, still adds complexity to the running software.
- bhrgunatha 11y ago> What is wrong with Mozilla at the moment? I keep asking myself the same question. With so many releases of firefox I seem to have to spend my time searching for a way to remove or disable many of the features they push. I think the problem is this: browsers are quiet mature in terms of features, so now to innovate they need to force features that don't really belong in the browser. Either fix the pitiful state of bookmark management in your browser or let the add-on take the burden.