I find it interesting that your main complaint is that the red cross lets bureaucracy and red tape get in the way of actually helping people on the ground, whil

I find it interesting that your main complaint is that the red cross lets bureaucracy and red tape get in the way of actually helping people on the ground, while the article seems to complain about the lack of accountability and transparency from red cross (which would require some bureaucracy and red tape). Maybe the Red Cross has trouble reconciling these seemingly conflicting goals (in addition to their alleged lack of competence)?