6 ms·
I would not let a single news story exclude you from including them. I've seen too many cases where journalists completely botch an investigative story due to
by mckoss 11y ago
I would not let a single news story exclude you from including them. I've seen too many cases where journalists completely botch an investigative story due to biased sources and their own ignorance.
I personally would like to see the Red Cross's response.
- meesterdude 11y agoFWIW, they have something of a history if I recall; i only recently found out a few days ago, really.
- mckoss 11y agoFrom my memory, they had a reputation for bait and switch - raising money during a disaster, but spending it elsewhere. I think they cleaned that up, including a change in leadership. This article is new in claiming innefectiveness at usefully spending money to help disaster victims. I would love to see a detailed audit.
- TylerE 11y agoIt's not that they are duplicitous really - it's that stockpiling large amounts of supplies has a leadtime measured in months. Money you give today can't buy tents in Haiti tomorrow - those have to be ordered, manufactured, shipped...
- danso 11y agoThis is one in a series of investigative stories conducted by ProPublica and NPR (disclosure: I used to work at PP but not on this project): http://www.propublica.org/series/red-cross http://www.propublica.org/series/red-cross Red Cross has made responses; I haven't read all the stories but my impression has been is that they haven't been on-point rebuttals: Red Cross Demands Corrections to Our "Misleading" Coverage. Here's Our Response - http://www.propublica.org/article/red-cross-demands-corrections-to-our-coverage-our-response http://www.propublica.org/article/red-cross-demands-correcti... The project began last October: The Red Cross' Secret Disaster, which examined their aid after Hurricane Sandy: http://www.propublica.org/article/the-red-cross-secret-disaster http://www.propublica.org/article/the-red-cross-secret-disas...