5 ms·
Furious investors warn troubled Dubai it will 'never raise a penny again'
- rbanffy 17y agoAny investor who decides furiously will not remain an investor for long. OTOH, I can't imagine what sane person would invest there. Can't they tell a bubble when they see it?
- omarish 17y agoInvestors can tell a bubble when they see it, but we must consider that hindsight is 20/20 in these situations. And perhaps investing in a bubble is okay, just as long as you get out at the right time? A lot of the press makes this look like the end of the world. I don't want to make a hasty comparison, but let's contrast it to the $700bn dollar bailout that we saw earlier in the States .. $60bn exposure isn't quite as bad as it seems. The question is in underlying value. Aside from the world's speculation and the good word of the ruling family, there isn't so much backing Dubai. AFAIK, nobody owns a huge share of the markets, just the royal family. At the same time, it doesn't take much to apply some startup thinking to Dubai -- put a couple people together with some good ideas on how to shape the markets there, and Dubai could look drastically different 24-36 months from now. Islamic Finance could be an interesting starting point. Dubai will be very interesting as soon as all of this smoke clears up.
- adatta02 17y agoIt seems like the real shock to the world markets was that Abu Dhabi stood quiet instead of immediately stepping in to guarantee at least some of the money. It happened before http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123532630416442781.html http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123532630416442781.html so why not again?
- omarish 17y agoDubai and Abu Dhabi haven't always had the best relations - they're both Emirates but that doesn't mean that they agree on everything. Fiscal policy could very well be in this set of things. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8382275.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8382275.stm - have a look through the section titled "Competition". Also, oil is relatively inexpensive right now. Abu Dhabi exports a lot of oil. I don't want to risk making a false correlation, but that could have something to do with it.
- evgen 17y agoThere is definitely the fiscal policy aspects (Abu Dhabi has good reason to let Dubai and its backers know that it will not necessarily bail them out) and there are also socio-cultural aspects as well. Abu Dhabi is much more conservative than Dubai and there is some friction there that is getting magnified by the financial aspects.
- rbanffy 17y agoKnowingly investing in a bubble is almost as bad as propagating a Ponzi scheme. It may be legal, but it's quite unethical.
- darien 17y agoIslamic finance prohibits interest rate lending because of the Koran's condemnation of usury. What bank can achieve a profit under those circumstances? Especially in 24-36 months!?
- dagw 17y agoIslamic banks and finance institutes (like most finance institutes) are really good at coming up with various creative ways of working around annoying legislation. Basically they use various financial engineering tricks to create products that look they pay interest, while technically not paying interest. Google for 'sukuk' if you want a simple example.
- russell 17y agoNo they can't. They are so anxious to beat their quarterly earnings estimates and get their bonuses that they will invest in anything that pays an extra quarter of a percent. Hence the huge losses in the 70's from investing in South American dictators, the savings and load crisis of the 80's, the Mexican devaluation, the collapse of the ruble, the Japanese real estate collapse, the southeast Asian collapse, the current derivatives mess.
- cwan 17y agoThe problem with investors in the developing world is that investors have always had a not unreasonable expectation that if anything went wrong, someone would be there to bail them out. Someone almost always had - whether it be the World Bank, IMF, or some other organization - and I suspect at the end of the day, we will see some form of bail out by Abu Dhabi. To worry that this sets a horrible precedent ignores all the previous examples you point out. If we started to allow some of these countries to see the consequence of their governance, perhaps we would see significantly better governance. This has as much to do with investors as it does with the governments and multilateral organizations that enable them.
- theprodigy 17y agothis is actually partially true. A lot of the investors that are putting their money in dubai and the emmirate states do believe that these countries and investments will not fail and the world community will not let them fail. The reason being these places are suppose to be the model for whole islamic world. Showing a vision to the whole islamic community of what is possible when there is strong economic relationship with the global community and the westernized world. A huge catastrophic failure in these areas will greatly hinder globalization in the middle east.
- omarish 17y agoSo you're suggesting that despite years of education and learning from mistakes, investors never learn from their past mistakes, and that all of these crises you mentioned are exactly the same thing? This could make sense if you're talking about currency arbitrage, but investing in entire sectors of a nation is different from trading tenths of a cent of a dollar.
- jaydub 17y agoI read The Ascent of Money, by Niall Ferguson over the summer and I am reminded of a passage discussing Argentina: "So successful did Argentina's default prove (economic growth has since surged while bond spreads are back in the 300-500 basis point range) that many economists were left to ponder why any sovereign debtor ever honours its commitments to foreign bondholders" http://books.google.com/books?id=JA_IYJ0P4ZkC&lpg=PA4&dq=niall%20ferguson%20safest%20default&pg=PA115#v=onepage&q=&f=false http://books.google.com/books?id=JA_IYJ0P4ZkC&lpg=PA4...