3 ms·
Deployed on the server or to the device? If you are referring to device, I'm extremely doubtful. I remember that Oracle had a Java booth at the San Mateo Maker
by codesushi42 11y ago
Deployed on the server or to the device? If you are referring to device, I'm extremely doubtful.
I remember that Oracle had a Java booth at the San Mateo Maker Faire 2014. I was at the Faire the entire 2 days and would pass the booth every so often in the convention center. I hardly saw anyone take any interest in the idea of Java on embedded devices, and the booth remained empty despite some good presentation with large signs and plenty of floor space.
Anecdotal? Maybe. But I think many device guys would cringe at the idea of something as bloated as Java running on a device. I've done my share of Java on server and Android at Google, and I certainly do. And by bloated, I mean things that come with Java-- large dependency trees, libraries, verbose code etc.
I think both NodeJS and Python are gaining more mindshare on the device-side:
https://github.com/rwaldron/johnny-five https://github.com/rwaldron/johnny-five
If you mean server-side, I would agree more. Java is certainly fast enough to run the data collection frontend. Kafka and Storm are great libraries that you can fit into a Lambda architecture for processing real-time data. And of course there are frameworks like Hadoop, Mahout, etc for the batch processing end.
Still, there's MQTT which isn't Java-centric, and IMO lacks an adequate message broker in Java. And Go is a another good option on the data collection side as well, and will probably get better.