3 ms·
If you want to talk about "widely deployed VMs" then Dalvik is faster. If you want to talk about VMs in general then there are many that are faster, e.g. LuaJIT
by twp 11y ago
If you want to talk about "widely deployed VMs" then Dalvik is faster. If you want to talk about VMs in general then there are many that are faster, e.g. LuaJIT.
- coldtea 11y agoActually no, Dalvik is slower than the JVM and with worse GC. And LuaJIT faster than the JVM? Where you got that? You wont fine many benchmarks or people agreeing with you. LuaJIT is faster (much) than most scripting languages, but not faster than Java. Are you comparing startup time?
- danieldk 11y agoDalvik is ~3x slower than JVM for compiled (JITed) code (on an ARM Cortex A8): https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2388956 https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2388956