5 ms·
Wouldn't the first act of an evil government be to outlaw civilian armaments and confiscate these guns? At that point, you'd be forced to either go to war(which
by Sacho 11y ago
Wouldn't the first act of an evil government be to outlaw civilian armaments and confiscate these guns? At that point, you'd be forced to either go to war(which you agree you would lose), or lose your weaponry. Perhaps the proliferation of guns would help the now criminal resistance acquire an arsenal, but I'm skeptical. European history is rife with examples of armed resistance forming from an unarmed populace.
I wouldn't call my ancestors 'helpless' considering their multiple armed rebellions and constant resistance after being conquered, or examples I'm less acutely aware of like the French or Polish resistance during WW2. It's also worth noting that while this resistance was very much detrimental to the hostile government, it was never the primary factor of its downfall.
- Crito 11y ago> "Wouldn't the first act of an evil government be to outlaw civilian armaments and confiscate these guns?" And now you know why gun registry laws regularly get torpedoed. Hard to round up all the guns if you don't actually know who has what.
- 15155 11y ago> Wouldn't the first act of an evil government be to outlaw civilian armaments and confiscate these guns? Historically this is exactly what happens. Proponents of gun registries know this, want this. People who value their freedom have to fight a (so far, winning) battle to maintain their Constitutionally-protected rights.