A suitable response would be to present proof of what happened and who did it, then pursue law enforcement solutions and public shaming. If this had been a lan

A suitable response would be to present proof of what happened and who did it, then pursue law enforcement solutions and public shaming. If this had been a land incursion, and the public Army had been the responding department, there'd be no question, and we'd have pictures of tanks and AK-47s on the front page of every newspaper. Congress would be discussing nothing else. However, it's the spies, and FBI wannabe-spies that are probably handling this. The proof is not as obvious as a tank in North Dakota, but I suspect that there's is enough evidence and forensics to prove to the NSA and their ilk who did it and how. But a spy's natural instinct is to hide the fact that they know something. It's a card up the sleeve, and their concern is more about being able to continue to spy than to stop a currently ongoing crime.