3 ms·
General thought... Two things strike me about these issues. Firstly there is a disconnect between a lot of citizens and those who are supposed to be there to p
by alan_cx 11y ago
General thought...
Two things strike me about these issues. Firstly there is a disconnect between a lot of citizens and those who are supposed to be there to protect those citizens; and second, we need to decide how much risk we are prepared to accept for freedom.
The FBI, MI5, and their ilk are there to protect the people. Yet an awful lot of the people talk about the likes of the FBI as thought they are just doing what they do because it pleases them, and them alone. But Im pretty sure the FBI believe that they are there to protect the people. To that end, I believe the people who work in the FBI are sincere. Somehow this must be reconciled.
As must freedom v's risk. I think there needs to be a rational debate about how much risk we are prepared to accept for an agreed amount of freedom. We simply cant have freedom with out risk. The only way to eliminate risk, is to eliminate freedom.
People need to address these two issues fairly soon, other wise, I think we are all in a while lot of trouble.
- ionised 11y ago> The FBI, MI5, and their ilk are there to protect the people. I'm not at all convinced of this anymore. They exist to protect the government and the status quo. Whatever that may be at the time. Even civil liberties groups and charities are spied upon and labelled 'domestic extremists'.