3 ms·
I don't think you can blame the regulator for that. If you wanted you could calculate tables for "people" regardless of gender. Those tables would more accura
by mrgoldenbrown 11y ago
I don't think you can blame the regulator for that. If you wanted you could calculate tables for "people" regardless of gender. Those tables would more accurately reflect the population than purposely choosing the wrong subset of data to use.
- tdees40 11y agoThat leaves you open to anti-selection bias. It would make men's life insurance cheaper than in any other state, and you'd likely get more men buying in Montana.
- pbreit 11y agoI do t think he's saying remove gender from the equation. Just don't have two tables based solely on gender.
- baddox 11y agoThat sounds like a good way to quickly go out of business.