Really, this should be a mea culpa, but instead it's a rant. Dreamhost was too ambitious in trying to offer Rails hosting given their legacy infrastructure. A

Really, this should be a mea culpa, but instead it's a rant. Dreamhost was too ambitious in trying to offer Rails hosting given their legacy infrastructure. And now they're punting. So why did they support RoR to begin with? "Ruby on Rails seemed to really fit in with our company philosophy and we thought our existing customer base would love it." Okay guys, so what have you learned here?