5 ms·
Horrid. Besides poor threading (I'm speaking about the UI itself), it's unbelievable how HEAVY google groups feels when loading and using their web interface. I
by tenfingers 11y ago
Horrid. Besides poor threading (I'm speaking about the UI itself), it's unbelievable how HEAVY google groups feels when loading and using their web interface. It's so sad to think that google groups was the best interface ever to nntp in the past when it took over dejanews.
But it doesn't stop there. I had endless problems with regular subscribers ending up as junk. Likewise, as a subscriber, I had several issues in the past with subscription, where I had to contact the owner of the list and "debug" the issue (like there's anything to debug really: it just goes to junk and there's nothing you can do).
It doesn't help that google groups doesn't show prominently the fact that it's a regular list you can subscribe to without creating any account.
Fortunately, google groups generally plays well with gmane.org, so as long as they don't screw that up, I couldn't care less.
- DanBC 11y ago> It's so sad to think that google groups was the best interface ever to nntp in the past when it took over dejanews. The best WWW interface! slrn or pan or almost any other newsreader were great.
- bostonvaulter2 11y agoDo you prefer gmane's interface over google groups?
- tenfingers 11y agoYes. I just use a news reader via gmane. And via web, the "threaded view" is blazing fast.