3 ms·
If he does not support discrimination against foreigners, then why does he suggest to use government resource to limit foreigners' ability to do work for US cor
by dennisgorelik 11y ago
If he does not support discrimination against foreigners, then why does he suggest to use government resource to limit foreigners' ability to do work for US corporations?
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- saalweachter 11y agoH1Bs are a way to discriminate against all workers, foreign and domestic. The domestic workers are competing in a larger hiring pool, lowering their wages. The foreign workers are operating with heavy restrictions on their employment and stay in the country, lowering their wages. The better thing to do is to lower barriers to immigration, both temporary and permanent, not play one labor pool against another to the benefit of capital.
- dennisgorelik 11y agoYou got it wrong. Discrimination is created by the laws that prohibit foreigners to work in the US by default. Then H1b and other immigration "holes" soften that discrimination. TulliusCicero wants to remove "holes" that allow foreigners to do work for the US companies. Such removal of "holes" would in effect make discrimination against foreigners more severe.
- yopodtoh 11y agoDiscrimination against foreigners is the law. In the US, and just about every other nation, this is the case. Many believe that a good government should consistently enforce its good laws and change its bad ones. So either the government should enforce the visa laws, to the benefit of some US citizens and at the expense of some foreign workers and their employers, or change the law to allow foreigners different rights with respect to the US labor market.