3 ms·
> You can't be 100% long term Amazon?
by MrBuddyCasino 11y ago
> You can't be 100% long term
Amazon?
- discodave 11y agoThat only works as long as the founder or somebody equally powerful is in charge. Everybody else is beholden to the board and thus the short-medium term impact on the share price.
- MrBuddyCasino 11y agoTrue, but this doesn't invalidate my point. Its more of an argument that non-public or founder-controlled companies enjoy a competitive advantage.
- mathattack 11y agoIn some cases they can. It will be interesting to see how Dell plays out, even if it's hard to generalize from just one data point.
- mathattack 11y agoAmazon is. So is Google. Both have strong founders, and were very explicit in their IPOs about this. Even still, both need a certain level of profitability to sustain themselves. In addition, many companies that spend too much time in the future get complacent about the present. (Look at all the research at Xerox PARC that got commercialized elsewhere) There are many other companies that either lack that credibility, or have a history of wasting money. (>50% of M&A deals subtract rather than add value to the buyer)