3 ms·
The other poster's words contribute to putting a hero in jail for treason. Mine might not be productive because they're accusatory. I'll take that chance consid
by fineman 11y ago
The other poster's words contribute to putting a hero in jail for treason. Mine might not be productive because they're accusatory. I'll take that chance considering the stakes.
How counter-productive would you feel this was if it was your family unlawfully detained?
And, if you'll note, their words are personal. They attack and denigrate Manning specifically and by name, despite evidence. I only refer to them in the abstract because I'm referring to anyone who feels or says what they do. This is important - their words follow Manning forever, mine are only here in this thread, only attached to their hate speech. If they walk away from the lies, they walk away from my judgements.
We shouldn't pretend that willful ignorance is a justifiable opinion that deserves respect - lies are lies, and these ones specifically are calculated to put an innocent in prison.
- pc86 11y ago> I'll take that chance considering the stakes. Seriously? You're commenting on an internet forum. There are no "stakes." There is no reason not to be civil.
- fineman 11y ago> You're commenting on an internet forum. There are no "stakes." Whoosh. At risk is ... some incivility. Maybe. And we're already there because of the slanderer. Attacking someone like that is cyber-bullying. To keep wrongly harassing someone with lasting, hurtful, and harmful messages. The reason not to be civil and/or ignore the troll is precisely that it doesn't work. Calling them on it builds a culture of challenging lies - making it safer (and more polite) for everyone in the future.