> If you know what you're doing, CLI is just faster. This is quite true with other Git GUIs since they pretty much wrap the Git CLI and add a bunch of dialogs

> If you know what you're doing, CLI is just faster. This is quite true with other Git GUIs since they pretty much wrap the Git CLI and add a bunch of dialogs and whatnot, but GitUp was designed especially to avoid that. I'm a big user of the CLI myself, so the last thing I wanted was to build a Git client with a slower interaction model :) Between the keyboard shortcuts and the fact it deals directly with the repo database, GitUp is actually faster than the CLI in a number of cases. Experienced Git users do notice it on Twitter and on the GitUp forums. One example from my workflow: just rebasing my work branch is instantaneous in GitUp while the Git CLT takes a couple seconds (the UX being as fast in both cases to perform the operation, so a net gain for sure). YMMV of course and you can totally use GitUp for some operations and Git CLI for some others.