4 ms·
You're assuming their options are to stay or to be unemployed for 3 months. I'm saying it would be easier to find a job immediately (when there are fewer people
by itsybitsycoder 11y ago
You're assuming their options are to stay or to be unemployed for 3 months. I'm saying it would be easier to find a job immediately (when there are fewer people on the market) than wait until everyone is laid off and you have more competition for jobs.
More likely, if they'd left immediately, many of them could have gotten the equivalent of 4 months wages at their new job, since hopping is often the best way to get a raise.
- rhino369 11y agoWhy not both? Take the deal and start looking for a new job immediately and leave when you get it.