4 ms·
This looks great. How does the approach compare to Tesseract? Would it be possible to beat the accuracy of Tesseract with this? Are there any numbers on how lo
by jorangreef 11y ago
This looks great. How does the approach compare to Tesseract? Would it be possible to beat the accuracy of Tesseract with this? Are there any numbers on how long it would take to process an image once trained?
- megalodon 11y agoThanks for the suggestion to measure the image processing time, that could be interesting. To be honest I haven't yet tried Tesseract so I can't make any comparisons. However, I do believe that converting the network input to character codes (output layer size 4 bits for digits, 8 bits for letters) instead of using a softmax layer (would need 10 bits for digits, 26 bits for letters) is a novel approach that really improves performance.