> even if they only vote against the bill because of its draconian copyright rules I think it's about time that politicians start voting against bills because

> even if they only vote against the bill because of its draconian copyright rules I think it's about time that politicians start voting against bills because of the underhanded way they were drafted, and that voters start to support this behaviour. It doesn't have to be binary, either. "No for now but you can present it again in a year's time so that it can receive proper debate" should be perfectly acceptable. If for a process reason that actually means "No forever" in practice, then it should be made clear that it was the underhanded process that led to "No forever" and not the politician who was forced to vote it that way just because there was no opportunity to fix the process.