> I can not believe people think they have the prerogative to stop other people from reclining. It is intended functionality and we have certainly paid for that

> I can not believe people think they have the prerogative to stop other people from reclining. It is intended functionality and we have certainly paid for that. Well I guess that is the question: What did we pay for? Did we pay for comfort? Reclining does seem to offer that. Did we pay for discomfort? Not reclining may be a cause of mild discomfort. Who would pay for that? Did we pay for actual physical pain and significant discomfort? Hell no, but if you are tall and the person in front does recline then this is a reality. I can't believe people think that have the prerogative to cause other people actual pain. I'm really not convinced you or I paid for that.