4 ms·
Unfortunately the selected answer is meaningless. Quoting mine, which is below and has a higher score <grumble grumble>: Such a list [of airlines] would not b
by jpatokal 11y ago
Unfortunately the selected answer is meaningless. Quoting mine, which is below and has a higher score <grumble grumble>:
Such a list [of airlines] would not be meaningful. All airlines have wide rules to prohibit "tampering" with seats, with Knee Defenders or otherwise; you can improvise one with a well-sized bottle, after all. Those that point out the Knee Defender as banned are only making it explicit that this specific device is not allowed.
More to the point, if the passenger unable to recline complains, the flight attendants will insist that you stop using it.
- DanBC 11y agoYour answer is not an answer and should have been a comment instead. Rejecting the premise of the question is very frustrating and causes some people to not bother with SE. At least leave a comment asking if they'd consider different types of answer, but otherwise just ignore the question.
- jpatokal 11y agoSo if somebody asks on SE "How many minutes should I microwave my baby to dry them after a bath?", you would not consider "Don't" an acceptable answer?
- DanBC 11y agoCan you not see the difference between the two questions? There's no point continuing this discussion if you can't.
- jpatokal 11y agoSuppose the question was "Which airlines ban whacking reclining passengers on the head with rubber chickens?", and I answered "Well, they don't specifically ban assaults with rubber chickens, but any airline's T&C will have something banning violence against other passengers". Is my answer still off-topic? And how does this differ from what's essentially the same Q & A re: Knee Defenders? At the end of the day, the issue is that you can't tamper aircraft, not that you're doing it with a Knee Defender specifically.