3 ms·
Well, to be fair, if that's true, that's an improvement over 10^2 - 10^3 write cycles is what current NAND-flashes can manage. 10^12 is enough for it not to eve
by vardump 11y ago
Well, to be fair, if that's true, that's an improvement over 10^2 - 10^3 write cycles is what current NAND-flashes can manage. 10^12 is enough for it not to ever matter.
- Animats 11y agoNo, that's a low enough number that wear-leveling logic will be needed, as with flash memory. This is a fast device, approaching DRAM speeds. A program could easily bang on a cell 10^12 times.
- DennisP 11y agoYes, if you actually use it for RAM, which isn't proposed anywhere in the article.