4 ms·

Link to the bill text: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c113%3AH.R.3361%3A http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c113%3AH.R.3361%3A Section regarding bulk

Link to the bill text: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c113%3AH.R.3361%3A http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c113%3AH.R.3361%3A Section regarding bulk collection: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c113:4:./temp/~c113LpLijo:e34262 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c113:4:./temp/~c113LpL...:

cchip 11y ago
"The Government shall compensate a person for reasonable expenses incurred for producing tangible things"... Great! Thirty pieces of silver for everyone!
- chris_wot 11y ago
  Oh come on. That's not an issue by itself, it's perfectly reasonable under proper oversight to require that someone turn over material evidence. That's never been controversial.
  - themeek 11y ago
    Well... the draconian overreach of the third party doctrine, including the in praxis requirement to backdoor services sold to the public, is and certainly has been controversial, as have tap and trace laws. In fact, the only reason the Section 215 even had a sunset clause was because the legislature was so uncertain about the legislation that they wanted to put in an escape clause.
    - chris_wot 11y ago
      Fair comment.