3 ms·
That's a fair criticism, but it would be worth seeing the figure caption for it as well. If the caption had within it that the source was switched part way due
by tensor 17y ago
That's a fair criticism, but it would be worth seeing the figure caption for it as well. If the caption had within it that the source was switched part way due to a known problem, that would be fine.
Out of curiosity, anyone know a journal reference for that particular graph?
- greendestiny 17y agoComments on the OP suggest it was cover art. Not sure what to make of that without more context. Making it clear the data changed stops it being unethical, but I think the criticism of concatenating two data sources remains. Especially when the point of the graph is the sharp rise at the end - just as the data source changes. You really want to make sure the data sources correlate highly to make that kind of argument.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]