2 ms·
"Your real name, apart from almost certainly not being unique, isn't private information anyway, so no privacy is being lost." Yes, privacy is being lost. I b
by criley2 11y ago
"Your real name, apart from almost certainly not being unique, isn't private information anyway, so no privacy is being lost."
Yes, privacy is being lost.
I broke it down very simply: a public facing, crawlable webpage with a real-name is different than a NON-EXISTENT LINK.
Do you understand the difference between a "This Page Does Not Exist" error, and a "Hey, this is the public profile for Real Name" page? Do you understand the difference between say "Google.com" and "lkskldjfklsdjsdf.com"? One being a public page, the other being a non-existent webpage that returns an error?
I am shocked that your view of privacy is so broken that you cannot see the difference between publically posting a page on the public internet, accessible to literally every human on earth, and a whitelisted access page that has a total of about 300 human beings who can see it.
Do you understand why accessible to 5,000,000,000 is different than 300?
Then you can begin to understand privacy.