3 ms·
This is interesting too- "I really wish I could be more positive about the Kyrgyzstan material, but I swear I pulled every trick out of my sleeve trying to mil
by waterlesscloud 17y ago
This is interesting too-
"I really wish I could be more positive about the Kyrgyzstan material,
but I swear I pulled every trick out of my sleeve trying to milk
something out of that. It was pretty funny though - I told Malcolm
what you said about my possibly being too Graybill-like in evaluating
the response functions - he laughed and said that's what he thought
at first also. The data's tempting but there's too much variation
even within stands. I don't think it'd be productive to try and juggle
the chronology statistics any more than I already have - they just
are what they are (that does sound Graybillian). I think I'll have
to look for an option where I can let this little story go as it is.
Not having seen the sites I can only speculate, but I'd be
optimistic if someone could get back there and spend more time
collecting samples, particularly at the upper elevations.
Yeah, I doubt I'll be over your way anytime soon. Too bad, I'd like
to get together with you and Ed for a beer or two. Probably
someday though.
Cheers, Gary
Gary Funkhouser
Lab. of Tree-Ring Research
The University of Arizona"
http://www.eastangliaemails.com/emails.php?eid=12&filename=843161829.txt http://www.eastangliaemails.com/emails.php?eid=12&filena...
There really does need to be a full and detailed explanation of all this, immediately.
- JoachimSchipper 17y agoDoesn't that message support the reading "drat, I can't filter out enough noise to make it statistically significant, so I don't have anything to publish"? (Genuine question.)
- waterlesscloud 17y agoIt's in response to the climatologist trying to get him to publish anyway. He was being pressured to make his data fit.
- Tichy 17y agoPublish or perish. This all sounds very normal to me. I don't see references to making data fit, rather it sounds as if he is looking for a ways to extract some useful information from it. Anyway, you know what: people believe what they want to believe. This discussion is completely pointless.