3 ms·

The OP said in the case of an abusive husband. Are you suggesting that marriages should be held together so as not to damage the well being of the abuser by lo

• mafribe 11y ago
  And I questioned why the OP made such a one-sided example, one that falls squarely in line with those who -- empirically -- disproportionally benefit financially from a divorce. I'm suggesting that the main concern should be the well-being of the children. Most marriages fail, because the spouses get bored and tired of each other, and feel that the grass could be greener somewhere else. I don't think that's good enough a reason for divorce. At least wait until the children have left the home.