2 ms·
Aside from the carbon sequestration aspect, "burying" charred biomass is very interesting from a standpoint of improving soil quality, as mentioned briefly in t
by camccann 17y ago
Aside from the carbon sequestration aspect, "burying" charred biomass is very interesting from a standpoint of improving soil quality, as mentioned briefly in the article--though it's not really burying so much as churning it into the topsoil.
As an illustration, it's now known that the rich, fertile soils of the Amazon river basin are actually man-made, via a process of soil enrichment thought to involve burying smoldering wood to create charcoal, then breaking the char up and mixing it into the soil along with manure and other organic waste. The natural soil of the Amazon is actually very poor and infertile otherwise!
See also: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=934117 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=934117 (I commented there as well along similar lines)
Related articles on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_preta http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_preta http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biochar http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biochar
- jurjenh 17y agoI read the same articles, and this does seem to have potential in multiple fields - reducing carbon emissions, potentially increasing soil quality and hence crop yields (although I do believe this is specific to certain types of soil) - which may indirectly reduce the requirement for some types of fertilizer. And one of the amazing things of the "terra preta" of the amazon is that it seems to regenerate itself - unlike modern fertilizing which is generally required annually - this may indeed make it a disruptive technology from ~2500 years ago!