4 ms·
Thank you! I started this project with plain JS + lodash, went on to JS + ramda and ended up using PureScript. I absolutely recommend it. I also have been using
by sharkdp 11y ago
Thank you! I started this project with plain JS + lodash, went on to JS + ramda and ended up using PureScript. I absolutely recommend it. I also have been using Haste before (Haskell to JavaScript), but I really like the lightweight architecture around PureScript, the super-simple FFI and the generated JS.
- cies 11y agoThanks for these insights. I used the Fay project to compile Haskell to JS for some time. But in the next overhaul I probably switch to GHCJS, as for my project interop with server-side Haskell code it a requirement. If I did not need that interop I go for PureScript in a heartbeat. CoffeeScript/TypeScript/ES6/Opal, they all don't come close to what PureScript delivers.