3 ms·
On Twitter several months ago, the financial columnist Matt Levine said something along the lines of "Sand Hill Exchange can't possibly be legal" and one of the
by foobarqux 11y ago
On Twitter several months ago, the financial columnist Matt Levine said something along the lines of "Sand Hill Exchange can't possibly be legal" and one of the founders replied saying "You've got it all wrong, you just don't understand what we are doing".
Some things really are as simple as they seem on their face.
- cjensen 11y agoAfter reading Levine's column [1] and Sand Hill Exchange's response [2], I'd have to say they were amazingly clueless. [1] http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-03-11/how-should-a-bank-be- http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-03-11/how-should-... [2] https://twitter.com/sandhillx/status/575659746507649024 https://twitter.com/sandhillx/status/575659746507649024
- foobarqux 11y agoI can't imagine how that call went.
- sfrechtling 11y agoEspecially interesting in light of this, their analysis of traffic from the sec: http://sandhill.exchange/blog/sec-analysis http://sandhill.exchange/blog/sec-analysis
- evanpw 11y agobloombergview.com is 4th on that list of referrers from Google analytics (here: http://sandhill.exchange/blog/sec-analysis http://sandhill.exchange/blog/sec-analysis). I wonder if some guys at the SEC read his article and said "Hey yeah, that does seem illegal!".
- caminante 11y ago...and the SEC reads his blog so they make waves to GET on his blog ;-).