3 ms·
There's many more grading points to a computer solution. You're not graded for code style on the whiteboard; from what I've gathered, having an algorithm + code
by vdnkh 11y ago
There's many more grading points to a computer solution. You're not graded for code style on the whiteboard; from what I've gathered, having an algorithm + code to implement is sufficient (not counting the verbal part). On the computer, however, you bet they're going to grade you on style, syntax, leverage of oop. etc. It's not something I realized when I did it which is why it probably (they never actually told me the result) failed. I just did an easy solution- I had good seperation of functions, leveraged access modifiers, etc but I didn't wow them.
Right, I can't speak for my interviewers but I was given several whiteboard questions and a computer question. They probably wanted to see what my code was actually like on the computer, while they tested my problem solving skills on the whiteboard. I guess if you chose just the computer as an exam you'd treat it more like a whiteboard.
- mikeash 11y agoYou're talking about what people do, and I'm talking about what people ought to do. I accept that people might grade more harshly, but I'm saying there's no reason to do that, and if you want to apply whiteboard-style scoring to a typed solution, that seems like it would be a good idea and there's no reason you couldn't.