3 ms·
> He was speaking anonymously On-camera, being interviewed by a television reporter who was not hiding the fact that she was recording, and he was responding d
by kohanz 11y ago
> He was speaking anonymously
On-camera, being interviewed by a television reporter who was not hiding the fact that she was recording, and he was responding directly to her questions and under no obligation to answer. You consider that "anonymously"?!
Let me guess, he was drunk and thus should not be accountable for any of his actions.
- mc32 11y agoDo you think if we could that we should subject every idiocy fueled by alcohol, narcotics, etc., to the court of public opinion. Things that people say in frustration, a fit of rage, etc? If you were to record surreptitiously everything people said under all circumstances, you'd have a whole bunch of people to castigate and berate. More than you can imagine.
- kohanz 11y agoI think you're perhaps focusing on the PyCon case while I'm speaking only of the FHRITP case. If your "idiocy fueled by alcohol" is volunteering offensive answers to a reporter, on television, you've entered the court of public opinion on your own accord.