3 ms·
They've actually done studies on that - not with lojban, but with another simple constructed language: Esperanto. They found that students studying Esperanto fo
by klipt 17y ago
They've actually done studies on that - not with lojban, but with another simple constructed language: Esperanto. They found that students studying Esperanto for a year followed by French for 3 years fared better than students studying French for 4 years:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto#Language_acquisition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto#Language_acquisition
- tokenadult 17y agoAny such claim about Esperanto should be regarded as a claim that needs further verification. http://norvig.com/experiment-design.html http://norvig.com/experiment-design.html http://www.xibalba.demon.co.uk/jbr/ranto/ http://www.xibalba.demon.co.uk/jbr/ranto/ Anyway, it is very doubtful that such a claim, even if true for speakers of English learning French in England, would be true for speakers of Chinese learning Japanese in China (or the other way around) or for any number of other likely pairs of native and acquired languages.
- klipt 17y agoI only mention the Esperanto studies because (1) they seem to confirm RiderOfGiraffes' intuition (2) AFAIK Esperanto is the only auxlang for which such studies have been done. I suspect similar effects could be found with lojban, and would love to see more research in that area. However AFAIK no such research currently exists. I read the ranto ages ago and while it makes many good points, none of them are particularly relevant to the suggestion that the studies were faked. In fact imperfections like sexism could be advantageous if the student then proceeds to a similarly sexist European language (i.e. most of them).