2 ms·
>> that's doesn't make much sense Not sure I follow you. The Maple Leafs are one of, if not the richest team in hockey. They're rich because they've got incred
by slantyyz 11y ago
>> that's doesn't make much sense
Not sure I follow you. The Maple Leafs are one of, if not the richest team in hockey. They're rich because they've got incredibly rabid fans who will pay whether the team wins or loses, and prices generally go up in Toronto, not down. Most of my forty-some-odd-years have been "lean" years for the Leafs.
For a long time, the Ontario Teacher's Pension Plan owned a huge chunk of the Leafs, and there was little to no interest in spending what it took to produce a Stanley Cup winner, just some occasional lip service.
Taxes might be a factor, but less so for hockey than other sports. Toronto has a lot of cachet for being one of the Original Six (one of the reasons why Babcock chose Toronto over Buffalo) and for being one of the major focal points for hockey fandom.
- pitt1980 11y agoyou and the original author seemed to be indicating that they didn't have incentive to win because they already made alot of money I was just saying, if they make this much money when they're not winning, there is probably even more money to be made if they actually did win (though I suppose I may have overstated that, as doing what it takes to win also costs money [though that's probably less an issue in the games current fixed player costs mode])