3 ms·
Right, the panopticon is arbitrarily good for those it serves. And even if it doesn't serve you directly, less mistakes are made, and fewer get caught in the cr
by theAdvocate 11y ago
Right, the panopticon is arbitrarily good for those it serves. And even if it doesn't serve you directly, less mistakes are made, and fewer get caught in the crossfire, should there be any conflicts.
Even if it doesn't pay off for you, you still benefit indirectly. Things will eventually trickle down anyway. Patience is a virtue. So, if you know what's good for you, you'll keep your mouth shut.
But, what if? Let's say something goes wrong, and it goes bad. Arbitrarily bad. Things get fucked up. How bad can it get? What could possibly go wrong?
I bet there's absolutely no downside to this, whatsoever.