4 ms·
A basic human right is not the same thing as a shared moral obligation. The language of "rights" is often reserved for "categorically permitted acts", such as t
by camccann 17y ago
A basic human right is not the same thing as a shared moral obligation. The language of "rights" is often reserved for "categorically permitted acts", such as the right to think and speak as you wish.
A lot of people are resistant to using the language of "rights" in the context of "complicated systems that impose duties and burdens on the people who implement them". Even assuming that it is the duty and obligation of a moral, prosperous society to provide for the health of its members, many people would still not term that a right.
- eli_s 17y agoPlease review your understanding of a human right. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations in 1948, proclaimed that “everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of oneself and one’s family, including food, clothing, housing, and medical care.” In 1943, President Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed a ‘Second Bill of Rights’ for Americans, declaring ‘freedom from want’ to be one of four essential liberties necessary for human security. Roosevelt’s definition of freedom included “the right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health.” http://www.nhchc.org/Advocacy/RighttoHealthinAmerica.pdf http://www.nhchc.org/Advocacy/RighttoHealthinAmerica.pdf This is also a good read: http://civilliberty.about.com/od/equalrights/f/Health-Care-Human-Right.htm http://civilliberty.about.com/od/equalrights/f/Health-Care-H... Note that there is no mention of adequate care only for those that can afford it.
- eli_s 17y agoseems i'm now getting down voted out of spite :) I guess some people don't like being wrong hehe