4 ms·
Rather, 'under the hood' it _is_ a lisp (that is, an AST). The powerful feature here is that you visualize (project) the AST into a more concise representation
by jbnicolai 11y ago
Rather, 'under the hood' it _is_ a lisp (that is, an AST). The powerful feature here is that you visualize (project) the AST into a more concise representation
- pron 11y agoAll programming languages are represented as ASTs under the hood. There's no need to call an AST a Lisp.