3 ms·
S did not force himself on M. Objectively, he abused his power to make a trade for personal gain, and that's what you're judging. M was in no way forced to do a
by eldude 11y ago
S did not force himself on M. Objectively, he abused his power to make a trade for personal gain, and that's what you're judging. M was in no way forced to do anything and the way the story is presented is nearly as guilty as S in that she abused her sexual power for gain (undermining justice in the process) to free someone. The way it is presented, we don't know if it's altruistic or selfish.
For reference, I was JMSR.
- icebraining 11y agothe story is presented is nearly as guilty as S in that she abused her sexual power for gain (undermining justice in the process) to free someone Considering S's actions - arresting someone and then giving someone the choice between prostituting herself to him or leaving her loved one in prison - I have no reason to assume any justice has been undermined. The name might indicate a position of legitimate power, but the actions suggest he's nothing more than a kidnapper. Hell, who knows what he might have done to the prisoners had she refused.