4 ms·
> What if we turned this around? Then you would be making just as an asinine and ignorant statement which is factually correct, but grossly misrepresents the t
by noondip 11y ago
> What if we turned this around?
Then you would be making just as an asinine and ignorant statement which is factually correct, but grossly misrepresents the truth - that there is a distinct difference between plants and animals, but not so much between human and non-human animals.
http://fcmconference.org/img/CambridgeDeclarationOnConsciousness.pdf http://fcmconference.org/img/CambridgeDeclarationOnConscious...
- matthewmacleod 11y agoThen you would be making just as an asinine and ignorant statement which is factually correct, but grossly misrepresents the truth Yes, I would be – exactly the same as the one you made previously. Animals and humans are alike. Animals and plants are also alike. Your argument therefore appears to be one of scale – plants are sufficiently different, in your opinion, that eating them is not mutilation. I'm of the opinion that animals are sufficiently different from humans that eating them is not mutilation. You see the problem?